HIDDEN SECRET OF THE GREAT PYRAMID"S CONSTRUCTION UNCOVERED

Published on Apr 28, 2012 Hello Subscribers , We have personally been in contact with Jean-Pierre Houdin , and have add a link to his facebook account & a list of recommended videos he has provide for you to watch , (will upload at a later date ) but you can watch today from links below ! Enjoy ! Facebook https://www.facebook.com/jphoudin?fre... Hi LEXXTEX, Here are the links...Read the "User Manuel" to watch the chaters in following order... Chapters are: The two enigmas of the Great Pyramid http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NCK99... The genius of the builders (5th year) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NCK99... The genious of the builders (14th and 15th years) are missing in the 39mn long first video...so you have to stop after the Year 5 and go to these 2 missing videos before returning to the main video... The genius of the builders (14th year) - different video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_NC_X... The genius of the builders (15th year) - different video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_NC_X... Return to the main video... Seventy days to be reborn http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NCK99... The paths to eternity http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NCK99... The Great Pyramid seen from the sky http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NCK99... If you have a name and an e-mail address, I'm interested in ;-) Jean-Pierre THIS VIDEO IS PRESENTED AS " FAIR USE " FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSE , NON-PROFIT ,RECEIVING NO FINANCIAL CONSIDERATION FOR DISPLAY OF THIS CONTENT FOR PUBLIC VIEWING . IF YOU ARE THE COPYRIGHT OWNER / HOLDER OF THIS CONTENT AND DISAPPROVE OF ITS PUBLIC DISPLAY , PLEASE CONTACT THIS YOUTUBE CHANNEL FOR ITS IMMEDIATE REMOVAL. Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational, or personal use is in favor of fair use WATCH 100'S OF MORE GREAT VIDEOS , CHECK LEXXTEX PLAYLIST FOR BELOW : LINK TO LEXXTEX PLAYLIST : http://www.youtube.com/user/lexxtex?f... Category Education License Standard YouTube License SHOW LESS COMMENTS • 6,397 Oscar del Rosario Add a public comment... Top comments Xteve Tyler Xteve Tyler2 months ago this just proves the statement that archaeologists need engineers architects and a host of scientific doctrine at call to help understand their finds, A framework of "you find it, we will help explain it" relationship maybe? and here it takes a structural engineer to understand how to build a pyramid, and a revolutionary genius at that too. But because he opposes the narrow minded explanation of how it was made he gets little co operation from the official societies supposed to be studying them, so the archaeologists go blundering out, find some example of an ancient marvel of complex construction or staggering gearing systems ancient machine parts, like the antikythera mechanism because of pre conceived notions of what they consider was possible in the distant past, rather that what was actually possible, thus admitting our deficiencies because we could not do this today! convinced that the past generations were subservient to our present technological know how, these marvels are labelled as ceremonial jewellery or religious items, worse still pyramids labelled as tombs, (please where are the mummies?, why are they all being found in the valley of the kings or queens) these structures were not tombs, yet this myth still persists to this day, when they are confronted by something unknown a label is fastened, and there it stubbornly stays, dumped into a museum somewhere mislabelled religious jewellery, and anyone who has a more plausible theory is held up with red tape and bureaucracy till they are almost ready to give up. I applaud you Jean-Pierre Houdin the most feasible theory yet, still it opens even more questions which is a sign of a good working theory. Read more Reply 11 Raloh Washburn Raloh Washburn8 hours ago (edited) The pyramids are amazing. One day, a very simple mthod of constructing them will be revealed. It has to be so simple that we just overlook it. There is a lot of sand and water was not far away. It seems the answer should something to do with sand and water. Both of which can be accumulated in order to support or cantelever large stones. If the pyramids were built from the inside, I would be surprised. I have a theory that they filled each perimeter layer with sand and water to keep it stablilized and dug the wet sand inside, replacing the sand "tunnels" with stone. I believe they used sand to lift the stones via large, counterweighted, wooden levers. The stones could be passed from one lever to another and gently lowered by releasing the sand into another sand cache attatched to another lever (pre-loaded with stone) or simply dumped into the area surrounded by the stone perimeter as I mentioned above. There are two other key parts which I will leave out for now. I have been working this problem for years. The solution is simple. No ramps needed and less than 100 men onsite at a time required. Less than 50 men needed to get the stones from the quarry to the site. I promise, this was quite simple. The closer they got to the top, the less sand they needed. Read more Reply skipstah70 skipstah701 month ago Houdin's theory seems very plausible after watching this. It also seems to me it would be pretty easy to lay to rest with some better data from that exposed corner of the pyramid they reference in the film. They just leave you hanging though, saying they are going to go back and check for air draft, thermal information.. then the fricking documentary ends?!?! This movie was made what.. 10 years ago? Have they not had enough time to get the information?? Wouldn't you want to find the answer when it seems so easy to prove/disprove? Read more Reply 3 Tom Munson Tom Munson1 month ago skipstah70 Aargh Reply Yigal Zaid Yigal Zaid2 weeks ago There is a huge project going on right now called "ScanPyramids". Reply 1 Nucc's Garage Nucc's Garage2 weeks ago I like the theory of water shafts better. More plausible IMO. Reply 1 View all 5 replies Nucc's Garage Nucc's Garage4 days ago Yigal Zaid I went to the website and they don't have shit on that website Reply Yigal Zaid Yigal Zaid4 days ago (edited) +Nucc's Garage https://www.facebook.com/jphoudin it's Jean Pierre Houdin's facebook, the thinker of the theory. He published a video showing the spiral corridor with thermal imaging. Reply Dale G. Dale G.1 day ago Moving blocks one at a time up the internal ramp would have taken forever. It's a single-feed system with a bottleneck at every corner to rotate the block 90 degrees. So much easier to build forms and fill them with Davidovitz's geopolymer concrete. Laborers carrying baskets of the stuff could have come up the main ramp to the king's chamber level, and then used wooden ramps to access the upper parts. The main ramp could have been dismantled at the end and used for nearby buildings. Read more Reply jolllyroger1 jolllyroger12 months ago So this dipshit says back in kufu's day they didn't know about the wheel..... That is ignorance and a stupid statement..... And there are records of chariots and carts... Look at the freaking hieroglyphics and paintings they have carts wheel barrows and ... Deny it all they want light bulbs and batteries Reply 5 View all 4 replies winkipinky winkipinky3 weeks ago jolllyroger1 who's the dips hit now.. go read a history book or just Google it. chariots where invented way after the pyramids... Reply 1 Edward Duane Griffith Edward Duane Griffith1 week ago (edited) It's a well know fact that Adam and Eve had wheels, the chimpanzees taught them. The point is that all engineers will tell you we don't have the machinery to move the larger pyramid blocks do today. I personally think they used anti-gravity. What the heck could I possibly know, I've had my finger stuck in my nose since I was three, it's been two years, now I'm five and my arm is so tired. Read more Reply 1 cvcoco cvcoco3 months ago why did the video end without showing the final step, the scans or removal of stones inside the notch to reveal the internal ramp? The 1986 sub-density study showed the possibility so what happened? If its not true, Jean Pierre threw away 10 precious years of life. Reply 1 Yigal Zaid Yigal Zaid2 weeks ago Google "ScanPyramids" Reply ray ray ray ray2 weeks ago enough with the alien shit . Yeah aliens flying around the univers building pyramid that took them 20 yrs to build. Reply Daniel S Daniel S1 week ago Based on the fact that the pyramid of Giza was built in 20 years and has about 6.5 million blocks, it would call for placing a block about every 2.5 minutes. There is an explanation, but for some reason it is not being published. Think about it, 1 block every two and one half minutes! And they are heavy, at least a ton each. Reply C LC C LC1 month ago so many theories. is there anyone nowadays to really try to build a pyramid of that size and complexity using those 'theories' invented and see if it works? consider these real pyramids were built thousands years ago, and even nowadays we need engineers & architects to scratch their heads for years to come up with a theory, these pyramids are in one world : AMAZING!!! Read more Reply 1 Matthew Barbee Matthew Barbee2 months ago this has to be the most sensible theory of the construction of the pyramid I've ever heard. I hope you've been recognized for your work. Reply 2 Yigal Zaid Yigal Zaid2 weeks ago The work is in progress, google "ScanPyramids". Reply EverGreen1888 EverGreen18882 months ago I stopped at 'architect'...it's an engineering marvel, nothing to do with architecture. Bring me evidence from an experienced structural engineer and I might give it credence Reply 1 View all 4 replies Yigal Zaid Yigal Zaid2 weeks ago You Shouldn't be so judgmental, this "Architect" is proving his theory right now, and very successfully so far. Google "ScanPyramids". Reply EverGreen1888 EverGreen18881 week ago you're right...architects were designing shitty buildings in ancient Egypt just like they are today instead of giving any structural evaluations of structures or how their shitty designs seem to miss the point of 'that's not structurally sound' or 'structurally impossible'. The Golden Gate Bridge was designed by a civil engineer. Architects should just stick to kitchens and interiors...am I wrong? Read more Reply Nucc's Garage Nucc's Garage2 weeks ago and how is there graffiti in the inside the tomb? WTF! do they just let anyone in there at anytime. So much for a ancient monument. Reply brad lomas brad lomas1 month ago Your all wrong. It was made and set precisely in accordance with specific alignment to the universe by one man. Reply Bryan Matthews Bryan Matthews1 month ago right. fingerprints of the gods. there is INCREDIBLE engineering in the great pyramid. center of all land mass , scale to earth circumference, etc. Reply 2 jolllyroger1 jolllyroger12 months ago I get so tired of people concerning this saying that men were the beasts of burden.... Everywhere in the world the water Buffalo is the beast of burden even today they use carabao (water Buffalo) in the Philippines Thailand and most of the world to haul heavy loads.... And then these claims that it takes 1000 men or even 100 men to move 100,000 pounds.... I can move 100,000 pounds single handed and I am 53 yo and out of shape.... The idiots discount the use of tools that are made of materials that are repurposed after completion.... Such as large wooden capstans winches and Spanish windlass Chinese windlass and many more simple things that allow a single person to move huge weights using leverage...... Archemedes did not discover the lever.... And any person including dumb animals learn to use levers intuitively Read more Reply 2 View all 4 replies T Samuel Harrison T Samuel Harrison1 week ago jolllyroger1 & War Peace & Robert Mitchell, people please! A windlass is a wheel, a capstan is a wheel, the pyramids were built just before they got the wheel. And it is not true that if your lever is long enough even you could lift anything, since you must lift it enough fast enough to be relevant to the pace at which the project must be completed to be relevant instead of only in theory. In practice, if the lever gets very long the lever itself becomes so heavy as to become useless. If they were using logs like roller bearings in the grand gallery as shown, they were so close to having the wheel that they must have been experimenting with other precursors to the wheel as well. So they had roller bearings and not the wheel. I read that and say that sounds a lot like a wheel. Read more Reply Robert Mitchell Robert Mitchell1 week ago thanks for noticing me. Reply Notzrim 777 Notzrim 7771 week ago "Pharaoh (Egypt) the Great Dragon" - Ezekiel..."Satan, the Great Dragon" - Revelation. Thus the reasons you see Egyptian obelisks in Washington D.C. and the Vatican. Symbols of worship for the coming antichrist. Reply zane darling zane darling5 days ago enough with the "aliens, gods primative technology" bullshit. why cant people grasp the concept that this IS NOT mankinds first rise. my belief is that man has arose and fell many times over, destroyed its self and re evolved if you will. the egyptians had the technology, machinery and ability to build these structures in their time but over time it all eroded and disappeared and all that was left were the structures they built. gotta let go of the shit youve had forced on you and start thinking outside the box folks. this aint mans first rodeo. one mans opinion. Read more Reply John Bartram John Bartram5 months ago A brilliant and novel interpretation of the archaeology. Reply 7 View all 16 replies Da Trap pro Da Trap pro2 months ago +Sarahphina Margarita Go back read two reply's back. I have already dismissed you, yet you keep returning. Pain freak. Reply Sarahphina Margarita Sarahphina Margarita2 months ago +Da Trap pro HAHAHA Reply 1 Ryan Hesker Ryan Hesker1 week ago test the wood, I bet you will find resin, it's so easy "Shuffleboard" Reply James Rodgers James Rodgers6 months ago Well !! after reading all comments made about this topic ' some w/ merit & some w/ complete STUPIDITY ! To the ones whom cant find any logic in any of the pyramids around the entire world JUST HOW THE FUCK DO U EXPLAIN ANY OF THEM ??? Jimmie R Reply 3 View all 4 replies TheHoward72 TheHoward721 month ago people should check the boxes for insulting other people. there's nothing more insanely stupid and insulting someone on their stupidity when you are just as stupid! Reply 1 War Peace War Peace1 week ago lol n1 Reply Show more